Even so, quite frankly, I'm afraid that I don't quite see why this is at all important. That both a mother and a child were present at the birth of the latter from the former seems like a Duh! sort of biology question. I don't see any special sort of "meaning" to that fact.
I don't mean to make light of what you offered, but I geniunely am puzzled this time. *smile*
Re:
Even so, quite frankly, I'm afraid that I don't quite see why this is at all important. That both a mother and a child were present at the birth of the latter from the former seems like a Duh! sort of biology question. I don't see any special sort of "meaning" to that fact.
I don't mean to make light of what you offered, but I geniunely am puzzled this time. *smile*