I wouldn't be caught dead recommending Piers Anthony to anyone, even if I did enjoy him in my callow youth!
What did you use as a criterion for "mature content"? Like, why does Moorcock get it, while Martin (with, like, the blood and gore and incest and adults having sex with 13-year-olds, and that's just the first book!) doesn't? (Not criticising or anything, I don't think there's anything wrong with early-teens reading "mature" stuff, just curious.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2005-02-27 06:20 pm (UTC)What did you use as a criterion for "mature content"? Like, why does Moorcock get it, while Martin (with, like, the blood and gore and incest and adults having sex with 13-year-olds, and that's just the first book!) doesn't? (Not criticising or anything, I don't think there's anything wrong with early-teens reading "mature" stuff, just curious.)