News Items

May. 7th, 2004 12:08 pm
ladynox25: (Default)
[personal profile] ladynox25
Poetic justice.

A different sort of Cougar in your garage.

And for [personal profile] ceara, someone who loves rats.

Date: 2004-05-07 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
Massive violation of civil liberties in that first one. Won't stand up for a second if any of the men appeal it.

Date: 2004-05-07 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texas-tiger.livejournal.com
Yeah, you're probably right, but it does sorta make sense.

If they're screwing around and not willing to deal with the responsibility of raising the kids they produce, then they shouldn't have any more.

Date: 2004-05-07 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] larabeaton.livejournal.com
They shouldn't, but the right to reproduce is not something that is the business of any court to determine.

Date: 2004-05-07 07:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texas-tiger.livejournal.com
The court isn't. If you read the article carefully, it's given as an alternative.

It's also only being applied to deadbeat dads who have more than four children with three or more women *and* who are in arrears on their payments to the tune of a significant chunk of change.

They've already been found (or have pleaded) guilty. The sentence under law is jail time for thier offense. The judge merely gave them the option to choose vasectomey instead. All but one took it. They could have gone to jail instead.

Besides, vasectomy is, to some degree, reversable. If these guys ever really feel the need to reproduce, they can get it reversed.

Profile

ladynox25: (Default)
ladynox25

September 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 03:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios