Even so, quite frankly, I'm afraid that I don't quite see why this is at all important. That both a mother and a child were present at the birth of the latter from the former seems like a Duh! sort of biology question. I don't see any special sort of "meaning" to that fact.
I don't mean to make light of what you offered, but I geniunely am puzzled this time. *smile*
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re:
Date: 2004-02-07 05:27 am (UTC)Even so, quite frankly, I'm afraid that I don't quite see why this is at all important. That both a mother and a child were present at the birth of the latter from the former seems like a Duh! sort of biology question. I don't see any special sort of "meaning" to that fact.
I don't mean to make light of what you offered, but I geniunely am puzzled this time. *smile*