An Exceptional Movie Experience
Jan. 23rd, 2004 09:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...which, I just got back from. Having gone to the movies to see (what else?) The Return of the King (for the third time), I was rather shaken out of my WSOD by the fact that just before Frodo gets stabbed by Shelob, the movie jumped...to Frodo and Sam heading across Gorgoroth. A little while later, just as Sam and Gollum were battling it out on the slopes of Mt. Doom, it skipped again...and there was Eowyn handing Merry the reins as she hamstrung a mumak at the Battle of the Pelennor Fields. Then, just before Aragorn decided to march on the Black Gate, it skipped once more...and there was Sam looking for Frodo in the Tower of Cirith Ungol.
Having worked in a movie theater, I knew when the movie skipped the first time exactly what had happened. Theaters these days usually use a platter system, in which the film winds off of one platter, through the projector, and onto another platter. When the movie is over, the film is run through from the second platter back to the first and so on. The amount of film on any one platter, even for a two hour movie, is phenomenal. Therefore, movies don't get sent to the movie theater in one piece, but rather in several reels, which the theater then splices together, along with the preview trailers and any ads that they run. What happened in this case is simple; the movie was mis-spliced and no one caught it before it ran.
Needless to say, we got free tickets for another showing, but still...how many people out there can say they've seen any movie out of order, much less TROTK? Funny, even though it was mis-spliced, it still had enough oomph in it to keep me spellbound. Well done, Peter Jackson. Flaws TROTK may have, but it's still edge-of-your-seat-gripping the third time around--and even out of order! *grin*
Having worked in a movie theater, I knew when the movie skipped the first time exactly what had happened. Theaters these days usually use a platter system, in which the film winds off of one platter, through the projector, and onto another platter. When the movie is over, the film is run through from the second platter back to the first and so on. The amount of film on any one platter, even for a two hour movie, is phenomenal. Therefore, movies don't get sent to the movie theater in one piece, but rather in several reels, which the theater then splices together, along with the preview trailers and any ads that they run. What happened in this case is simple; the movie was mis-spliced and no one caught it before it ran.
Needless to say, we got free tickets for another showing, but still...how many people out there can say they've seen any movie out of order, much less TROTK? Funny, even though it was mis-spliced, it still had enough oomph in it to keep me spellbound. Well done, Peter Jackson. Flaws TROTK may have, but it's still edge-of-your-seat-gripping the third time around--and even out of order! *grin*
no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 09:18 am (UTC)In case you don't want to go through that: Erryf ynfg nobhg gjragl zvahgrf (juvpu vf jul zbivrf unir n cersrerapr sbe orvat nobhg a gvzrf gjragl zvahgrf, ohg zbfg rfcrpvnyyl abg a gvzrf gjragl zvahgrf cyhf n yvggyr ovg), naq n pbhcyr bs frpbaqf orsber gur raq bs gur erry, gurer'f n oynpx pvephyne fcbg (ba 2.35:1 cnanfpbcr zbivrf, guvf jvyy or n fgergpurq bhg biny qhr gb gur nanzbecuvp cebwrpgvba yraf) jvgu na benatl-lryybj obeqre va gur gbc evtug pbeare juvpu jneaf gur cebwrpgvbavfg gb fjvgpu bire gb gur bgure cebwrpgbe juvpu nyernql unf gur arkg erry ybnqrq. Gura, ng gur erny raq bs gur erry, gurer'f nabgure fhpu fcbg juvpu phrf vg. Vs qbar jryy, erry punatrf jvyy or orgjrra fprarf, naq nyzbfg nyjnlf orgjrra fubgf, gb znxr vg eryngviryl frnzyrff (yvxr QIQ ynlre punatrf fubhyq or, ohg gung tbrf jebat zber bsgra).
Lbh pna nyfb fbzrgvzrf fcbg erry punatrf ol gur nzbhag bs fpengpurf naq fcbgf gur svyz unf. Gur raqf anghenyyl jrne zhpu zber guna gur erfg.
Rot-13ed just in case you don't want to see this, as I think the movie I mentioned is better when you didn't know that yet.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-26 07:45 am (UTC)If the movie carried you even that way, the editing must have been... either better or worse than I thought; I can't decide.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 03:31 am (UTC)I've seen 'Memento' in chronological order. After seeing it the normal way around, that was a very weird experience.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 09:23 am (UTC)Do you know if it's possible to take, say, an American print and then somehow get subtitles under there in some way that does not involve just doing a whole new print?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 10:18 am (UTC)'Course, you get someone who knows what they're doing and they might be able to generate subtitles. I think that this is done for anime on a amateur basis, but that's videotapes (and possibly DVDs now, though I would suspect some copy protection issues there).
Wish I could help more.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-24 10:56 am (UTC)I tried to nudge KJ into the subtitling industry, but they seem to have all the people they need right now.